The winning Nomads |
Several times during the match a question crossed my thoughts - was it worth the effort our players were making? I do not want to answer the question but let me recollect one instance when this question flashed in my thoughts.
Purab was batting, we were looking comfortable in our chase and I was umpiring. On that particular delivery Purab came across in such a way that I had no view of stumps. He missed the ball and the wicket-keeper appealed, I thought it was for stumping, so I was relaxed that I dont have to make a decision because I had not seen anything that happened around the stumps as Purab had blocked my view. Suddenly I hear Mansoor who was fielding at the short mid-on suggesting that it was a clean bowled. So it was actually my decision. I asked Parthibhan our leg-umpire. He thought that the Zeb's hands hit the stumps and ball was no where close to the stumps. Our opposition immediately became aggressive and started to blame the umpires for being biased and their conversation suggested that they were on the verge of abandoning the match. For them there was no value of umpire's decision. I did not want the match to close in any undesired manner so I asked Zeb who was the wicket-keeper and main person involved in that incident and also a very respected person by both the teams. I actually asked him to make a decision and he suggested Purab was out. Poor Purab who at that time was all set to lead us to victory was forced out (a new way to get out in cricket) by the opposition.
Overall it seemed that our opposition had entered the field with a prejudice that we will not be fair in our umpiring. They were not even prepared to accept the calls of wides. LBWs decision when turned down are always unacceptable to the bowling team. There was one close shout but in that incident the ball had hit the pad outside of the leg stump, wicket-keeper Zeb knew it and did not appeal. We did not get much chance to see the fairness of the umpiring of the PFCC. We conceded only 6 extras and there were at least two stumpings denied because the guys who was asked to do leg-umpiring was not interested in the game in any form. We did get two LBW decisions against low order batsmen in our favor.
When the opposition is so biased, questions arise whether it make sense to play, even if for the sake of cricket. So I will not answer the question I asked and leave it to you and move on to the many good things that happened during the course of the match.
First, an excellent half century by Din, who I learned later, was playing his last match as he returns to Pakistan in a week time. It was his innings that held the PFCC batting together. He was the second last wicket to fall, that says a lot. He showed great temperament and virtually scored all his runs in the gulley and slip area with cutting. He was supported by Fawad in beginning, who played brilliantly until he was surprised by a low full-toss of Arpit. Later Din had some temporary support from a left-hander whose name is not known to me. Together they took the score from 90s to 120s.
For the nomdas, the real revelation was Arpit who changed his regular medium fast bowling to slow off-spins and ended up with four wicket, two in one over. Saghir bowled two beautiful deliveries to claim two wickets towards the end of his spell. The one that cleaned up the wickets of the Zeb was simply unplayable, otherwise Zeb is an accomplished batsman. Rajesh showed that even with an inured knee he can surprise the batsmen and claimed two wickets. I also two wickets including that of Din. Raghav then took the final wicket as we were playing 12 a side game. Adnan and Nila were unlucky to go wicket-less. It was not the most important aspect of out bowling that we had bowled out the PFCC for 128 runs. The most important aspect was that until 22 over we did not concede a single extra runs, no wides or no balls or leg byes or byes. In total we gave away 6 or 7 extras. In that sense 128 runs that PFCC scored was a great effort.
Vijay who returned to wicket-keeping after a long time was spot on. We did have few lapses in the field as a couple of catches were dropped and we could have converted few runs in to run-outs. All and all it was a superb effort and 128 was not a difficult score to chase.
We stared our chase with Rehan and Purab. Rehan apparently just cant hit the ball in the air. Yesterday he was caught just inches above the ground by Fawad, brilliant effort. But Rehan is so unlucky that his catches, however, difficult are never dropped. Raghav was promoted to fill in for Pandiyan. He stared very cautiously, and later he became such a tormentor of the PFCC bowling that I am sure they would not want to bowl to him again, particularly Din who was regularly hit for a six and/or a four in each of his three overs. After the Purab incident Rahul came in and the two left-handers never allowed the opposition bowlers to get to a good line. Runs kept coming until Rahul was given out on a dodgy stumping call. But by that time damage was done. After 17 overs we needed 49 runs. Raghav made it an easy task as he launched flighted deliveries of Din out of the boundary. Adnan wanted to finish and he showed his intentions. He also hit a funny boundary -- his on drive landed just in front of Rizwan as long on but the ball bounced over Rizwan and Adnan had a boundary. In the end Raghav, who had already completed his 50, very fittingly, lofted Mansoor for a six over long-on to finish the match. Later Raghav said that he was motivated by the foul talk of some of the PFCC players. They were talking in Punjabi but they perhaps did not know that Raghav understands Punjabi.
Among the PFCC bowlers the left-hander Lukman was brilliant. He cleaned up Saghir on a nearly perfect delivery which may have kept a bit low according to Saghir's expectations. PFCC struggled with their field placement and of course were not very sharp in the field. In the end 128 was just not enough and FNCC made an easy task of that.
It was very satisfying to win. Now we have six wins out of seven matches we have played. This victory was special because last year loss to the PFCC was responsible for out early exit in the BWCV league. More importantly, despite several attempts from the PFCC, we maintained out cool and finished the match without any visible incident.I dont know if more matches will help in developing a stronger sense of respect for both the teams.
This is my personal opinion that while nomads were playing to maintain their own high standards, perhaps PFCC were just playing to win. I think goals of a teams should go beyond wins and losses.
FNCC again showed that they are developing in to a good team. They are not afraid of experimenting as was seen in Arpit turning to off-spin. Everyone who get a chance grabs it with both hands as was seen in promotion to Raghav who scored a brilliant unbeaten 50. This is certainly making it difficult for Vijay, but perhaps only in a good way. Now Raghav and Rahul have been tested at top, I am sure if Fayas is promoted he will also do well, he is clearly a complete and solid batsman. In bowling I dont think Vijay can keep Nila for the old ball. I am very positive that he will be a big success with the new ball. Perhaps it is time to try Nila in the second spell.
Match ball that went to Purab as his Birthday present |
I also would like to say something about Vijay. Given the success of virtually every batmen on the top of the order he is not getting enough chance to bat but as a great leader of the team he has never let his personal performance come in the way of leading the team in the best way he can. Part of the success of all the batsmen can be attributed to the fact that they know that in the form of Vijay they have a formidable batsman to fall back on.
Finally, for it was Purab who was given Forced Out, and we were going to Purab's pre-birthday party we decided to dedicate this win to Purab and the match ball was given to him as a birthday gift -- which I am sure will remain a prized possession for him for time to come.
May be my adding will help you to answer those questions or at least it helps to the reader to understand the situation properly. Well I am Din, playing from PFCC and here I come…
ReplyDeleteI would like to cover main points of this blog so as you said, “For them there was no value of umpire's decision”, you are using these words for a team who has already participated in baden wurttemberg cricket league, in which umpires are always neutral and I think PFCC knows and realized the value of umpires decision much better than a team who was just playing friendly games in whole season, point?
I respect your view regarding an umpire who had no view of the stumps but think from a bowler point of view that both umpires are not giving out for a player who is “clean bowled”? :)
You used words like “PFCC were just playing to win” and “the opposition is so biased…” you are totally wrong in this regard as we were not playing with our complete team. Our four main players were not playing (Bilal Jan, Ammar, Vicky and Tanveer) and not only this, we were playing with 3 players (Luqman, Imtiaz and third one even I don’t know his name) who never ever played on flix pitch, it was their first experience. I really appreciate the bowling and bating performance of Luqman. So again these facts contradict whatever u said. Due to the long league matches (as we played semi-final) our players want to have rest but we were playing that game for having good relation between these two clubs of Freiburg.
Here I clear you one thing if your team has less extras, it was due to our umpires who were really not strict in decisions of wides and they let u guys to have a sound game as compare to you (as u were umpire) who was so strict for wides (this also shows me that you were just playing for WIN). Otherwise you guys must have 15-20 wides anyway…
At the end I would like to tackle myself :) whatever you said for Raghav and me. Well no doubt he played a wonderful innings. May be from cricket point of view you don’t know me, I am such type of person who always like to go for tough stuff. Frankly speaking, if I have to play next game against FNCC I would like to bowl Raghav again as compare to bowling you :)
May be you realized this thing in my batting. When you guys want to block me on cover area and I was continuously making score from that area. I enjoy taking runs from that area where other team tries to block me. This is what Raghav told to me at the end of the match when I personally went close to him and appreciated his batting, he said “Din this is what I learned from you in your today’s inning, that just play in your favorite area no matter how many fielders are standing to block you and I just followed you”. Look how friendly environment was among the players of two teams :)
I noticed once during the game that you were standing worried (one can imagine that u were deeply thinking about something important). If I know you are searching for an answer of that question what u raised in the start of the this blog, I must answer you at that time :) well there is saying of some one “During the game, don’t think stupid things but just concentrate in the game”.
Personally I don’t feel that the environment was not healthy from both teams. Both teams played well and it was clearly visible that they want to see a wonderful future of cricket in Freiburg. I wrote all this just after reading your view otherwise I was quite satisfied with the game. At the end I would like to say congrats to FNCC for a lovely game and victory against PFCC.
ps: Arvie I read your other blogs as well and I want to say, you are a great writer.
To Din
ReplyDeleteI am very happy that you took your time to comment and tried to balance the opinions. It is just unfair that views from only one side are presented.
I was not biased in my reporting of the match as much as your comments reflect. This is not my style I openly appreciated yours, Fawad, and the third no name guy. I repeat, given so few extras, it was a great effort to score 128 - in bowling Luqman was just spot on.
By the way, just because your team played the semi-final of a league does not automatically make you the team who can go for the hypothetical 'spirit of cricket award'. I myself have played in that league for a season and have first hand experience of umpiring. I have also seen the quality and knowledge of few guys who have been trained by the DCB for umpiring.
Just because we have decided not to play the league does not make us an inferior team. Give the administration that league I think it is better not to associate ourselves with them.
Think of this -- a bowler is called for a wide, the first wide of his spell -- he says to his teammates that its not a friendly match -- he bowls and swears on the pitch -- this is way before Purab incident -- umpire is not deaf. I could have stopped him from bowling then and there. And you want me to believe that there was some respect for umpires. [Please lets not go there].
Maybe you are right that I shouldnt have questioned the worth of the match. But you were there and you can recall how tense the situation became when you guys were bowling. Purab's is just one, of course the most salient, incident. With memories of the fateful match that was abandoned casting shadows, it is but natural to ask such question at the very instance it was raised. But I am trained to do multi-tasking. I umpired with the best of my experience and understanding of cricket and that question did not affect my decisions. And dont forget that it was still that worried me who asked Zeb to make a call and asked Purab to leave. Think of the batsman, think of the leg-umpire?? And imagine I wouldnt have sent Purab back??
As for the team: It may well be that because you had few players missing, and flix is not a natural surface for many of your teammates. As I said we fielded a string of unfit players. I think that balances. In the league you may had played 8 or 9 matches, so we had played 6 full matches. Not so much of a difference. We clearly had advantage of our surface -- but surface has always been in favor of the hosts.
There were clearly some sparks of friendship and maybe if the two teams play more they will understand each other's style of playing and this will help develop great comradery. The poll, which I assume is voted for by FNCC members, clearly shows that we want to play more.
GUYS,
ReplyDeleteThought it is an internal matter of both of your team. But I would support one comment of Arvie i.e.
"Just because we have decided not to play the league does not make us an inferior team. Give the administration that league I think it is better not to associate ourselves with them"
Surely the kind of administration BWCV league is having between 2009 to 19th June 2010 and then from March 2011 to date, we Cricket Lions also think many times before we go to field i.e. Is it worth to spend that much time and energy to deal with this managment again and again!.
Still wondering, whose idea was it that Arpit would bowl Spin?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI would like to add a point here. At first my hearty wishes to PFCC for reaching semis in this season but I would personally congradulate our very own Saghir bhai to help PFCC to reach this height in the league. Do not forget the support Nomads has given to PFCC by letting its backbone of the team to play PFCC on request from few people from your team.
ReplyDeleteFrom Din: "You used words like “PFCC were just playing to win” and “the opposition is so biased…” you are totally wrong in this regard as we were not playing with our complete team. Our four main players were not playing (Bilal Jan, Ammar, Vicky and Tanveer) and not only this, we were playing with 3 players (Luqman, Imtiaz and third one even I don’t know his name) who never ever played on flix pitch, it was their first experience. I really appreciate the bowling and bating performance of Luqman. So again these facts contradict whatever u said. Due to the long league matches (as we played semi-final) our players want to have rest but we were playing that game for having good relation between these two clubs of Freiburg. "
Answer: We never asked PFCC to play a match if they are short of players and later give excuses for the same.
Regarding team spirit, You could well ask your team mates for stumpings which were turned down. Me being the captain and also the person who was involved in that stumping, clearly would have told your captain or the batsman to show some spirit because the batsman clearly knew about the wrong decision. Even though all my team mates standing square and behind the wickets felt that no spirits were shown, I passified everyone and continued without any remark. This was just not to make things flareup.
Regarding the stumping of purav, it was a great gesture from purav and even Arvi's quality decision that he let the decision to be taken by your keeper. Me and the entire team were shocked by the decision as we(even Rajesh was very sure about it) could clearly see from the line that , the keeper had hit the stumps before it hit the wickets. Even your team mate was with us during this incident.
Spirit of the game does not come into place when the umpire turns down a decision and the entire team is upto him and arguing for the same. If we would have done that, I guess the match would have stopped long back with match being abandoned.
Anyways You and Fawad played brilliantly and a spl congrats to you both. All the very best.
@Raghav, It was Arpit's decision to bowl spin. He came to me and asked if he could bowl spin, I said why not if he is confident and did a fantastic job for us. So its completely his idea and full credit to him.